Archive for December, 2009

Broker talk around town

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

BrokerAs mentioned in my intro and the feature article on mortgage managers, the NAB has recently announced it’s acquisition of James Packer’s Challenger (now known as Advantedge) and made a commitment to fund mortgage managers without the need for securitisation, meaning increased competition in the lending industry and more options for borrowers.

Most banks have increased their stress testing for new loan applications and some of the resulting changes we have seen include; an increase in the living allowance, called the Henderson Poverty Index (AKA HPI) and lenders now assessing the loan applied for and other facilities held as if they were all Principal and Interest, even if the new loan requested is Interest Only.

With the RBA’s three consecutive increases to the cash rate over the past 6 months, fixed rate options from lenders have increased dramatically over the last 8 weeks. As a result it’s very hard to justify taking on a fixed rate loan at the moment. Here’s a snapshot of who’s offering what;

As at 10th December 2009

3yrs 5yrs
AMP 7.89% 8.39%
ANZ 7.69% 8.04%
Bankwest 7.79% 8.09%
CBA 7.74% 8.04%
ING Direct 7.79% 8.14%
NAB 7.59% 7.89%
Rams 7.29% 7.74%
StG 7.49% 7.89%
Suncorp 7.54% 7.94%
Westpac 7.59% 7.94%


The four “C’s” of Credit – Part 4 – Capital

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

CapitalOver the last 3 months we’ve discussed the first three “C’s” that are used by lenders to assess all loan applications, being Character, Collateral and Capacity. In this issue of the Trilogy Report, we consider the fourth and final “C” – Capital.

As the term suggests, “capital” is all about how much you are able to contribute to the transaction. In other words, how much cash are you chipping in as a deposit? Capital is the bank’s barometer that helps them to assess how committed you actually are to the deal and as such, it speaks volumes in your application.

For instance, are you seeking 100% finance or are you only asking for 60%? Now, picture yourself as the credit officer; are you more likely to approve a loan at 60% or 100% of the asset’s total value?

As you are probably already aware, the lower the level of funding sought (what we call the Loan to Value Ratio or LVR for short), the less risk the lender is taking, as a higher degree of risk is transferred to the borrower.

This is essentially due to the fact that if you default on your loan and fail to make the repayments, forcing the bank to sell off the asset, the bank risks losing less of their funds if a larger deposit (or a higher proportion of capital) is offered by you at the outset.

In other words if you pay a 40% deposit and the bank provides you with the balance of 60%, while you will lose your contribution in its entirety, the bank only has to recoup 60% of the original sale price of the asset in order to break even and recover their funds. Hence, a larger deposit and therefore a smaller LVR makes your loan application more appealing, as the banks have greater peace of mind in knowing that should things go pear shaped, their money is more likely to be safe.

What you, as the borrower, need to realise is that Capital is effectively the lynch pin of your deal and depending on the size of your deposit, can make or break your loan application. Basically, a substantial deposit can pretty much get any loan over the line.

I once heard someone say, “You can insure a burning house for the right premium” and essentially, the same applies to getting the nod from your lender; you can virtually get any loan approved with the right amount of deposit or Capital.

So let’s have a look at some examples of how Capital can sway the banks in your favour, even though your application may be lacking when it comes to any of the other three “C’s”…

Assuming your loan application is light on Character (you might have defaults on your credit report, be new to the country, have slow credit accounts, etc). An offer of more upfront Capital can override these glitches and persuade the bank to say yes. This is because you are reassuring them that although you may have made some mistakes with credit in the past, or they may not be certain as to your commitment to the deal, your contribution of a larger deposit is proof that you are indeed a “safe bet”.

What if your application is supported by security (Collateral) that will be difficult for the lender to sell in the event of a foreclosure? It could be a retail shop front in a street that has a high level of vacancies or a block of 6 units in a small country town for instance. From the lender’s perspective, both of these scenarios carry a higher level of risk than normal residential housing in the suburbs. They might look at that collateral unfavourably because if they are forced to sell and recoup their debt, they could have trouble finding a buyer willing to pay the necessary price.

In this situation, the lender will ask you to assume more risk and contribute more cash (AKA “hurt money” or “skin in the deal” for obvious reasons), thereby lowering the LVR and reducing their risk. By failing to provide the extra cash, you are essentially sending a message to the lender that you are not as committed to the whole transaction as you expect them to be.

In recent times, many property investors were unable to provide evidence of Capacity in the conventional way; in other words, they could not necessarily assure the banks that they could meet the required repayments for the amount they were seeking.

This may have been due to the fact that a large portion of their income consisted of cash, or they were behind in their tax returns. In this situation, the lender would ask the borrower to increase the deposit on their application to assume more risk and in turn, they would overlook this Capacity shortfall.

They would offer the applicant a “Low Doc loan” and although these still exist to some degree today, the banks now require extra evidence in order to get them across the line. They have also reduced their exposure to them by forcing the borrower to contribute more cash to the deal; hence lowering the LVR “just in case” the borrower cannot meet the repayments.

Now throughout these last few paragraphs I’ve been using the terms “cash” or “deposit” when discussing the possibility of reducing the LVR to entice the lender into approving your loan application. What I have failed to mention however, is that this money can actually be borrowed from another source or against other security. This means you can still gear at a higher level, say 100% or even 106% to cover all costs; it just might mean you have to approach two different lenders to secure funding.

Let’s look at an example of how you might do this if you decided to purchase a retail shop front for $600,000;

In Diagram 1, we are contributing the deposit and closing costs using our “saved up cash”.

diagram1

In Diagram 2, we buy the same property but pull the deposit from another property that has a Line of Credit against it and is possibly held with another bank.

diagram2

As you can see, the lender is happy with a reduced LVR at 70% and the borrower wins too as they essentially managed to secure106% funding.

Of course there are some industry standards applicants must meet when it comes to the amount of deposit required to buy a property. Here’s a bit of a guide as to how much deposit lenders will ask for on individual securities, assuming the applicant’s Character, Collateral and Capacity are favourable.

Keep in mind as you read through the following that your closing costs, such as legal’s, rates adjustments and stamp duties, are payable in addition to the deposit. As a guide, approximately 6% of the property’s purchase price is usually ample to meet all of these and in some states you’ll need a bit less. It goes without saying that you should cross check all associated purchase costs before you buy. Now, back to the required deposit amount for various securities…

  • Residential houses in the suburbs – 20% to as low as 5%, depending on whether or not you want to incur a lender’s mortgage insurance fee.
  • Block of 6 units on single title – Typically 40% is needed, but some lenders will go as low as 30%.
  • Commercial property such as a retail shop – same as per a block of units in the above example.

With the understanding that Capital is effectively the make or break aspect of your loan application, you have the capacity to buy any property you like – as long as you are prepared to save the necessary deposit to get the bank’s nod of approval. In other words, the property you can buy will only be restricted by the amount of deposit you are able to contribute.

As a rule of thumb, a smaller deposit paid to the lender usually equates to a higher interest rate and additional fees. It is very much user pay and remember – there are no free lunches when it comes to the banks!

Where are clients buying and why?

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Settlement Date – 30/10/2009
Client – Interstate Brisbane – 1783
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $526,000 -
Transaction type – On Market – private treaty
Suburb – Clear Mountain, near Brisbane
Property Type – Vacant Block of Land
Attributes – Large elevated block of land with city and farmland views, purchased to build large owner occupied Taj Mahal.


Settlement Date – 30/10/2009
Client –Local – 2019
Purchase type – On Market private treaty
Purchase price – $335,000
Transaction type – Owner Occupied work transfer
Suburb – Port Macquarie
Property Type – Established
Attributes – 3 bed with ensuite and double garage in a nice part of town near the water.


Settlement Date – 27/10/2009
Client – interstate Brisbane – 1638
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $690,000
Transaction type – On Market – Private Treaty
Suburb – Currimundi, QLD
Property Type – Currently a 3 bed with ensuite shack made of Bessa blocks
Attributes – Located 150m from the beach, this property was bought for the land content only. The client intends to demolish the existing dwelling to construct a new home at a cost of $400k. it is expected that the property will be worth approximately $1.1m upon completion. The client specialises in purchasing tired houses, renovating or redeveloping them and revaluing to extract equity. They typically buy 1 to 2 properties a year and have successfully done well with more than 10 such deals across the Brisbane area.


Settlement Date – 23/10/2009
Client – Interstate – 1602
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $380,000
Transaction type – On market – Private Treaty
Suburb – Manly – Inner Brisbane
Property Type – 3 bed townhouse with 1 bath and single lock up garage, 100m2 living area
Attributes – Four streets back from beach, the client used a buyer’s agent to source this property as they are in the Army on deployment. Currently renting for $380pw.


Settlement Date – 09/10/2009
Client – Local – 1545
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $485,000
Transaction type – On Market
Suburb – St Kida, Melbourne
Property Type – 2 bed unit with single bath and off street parking
Attributes – Car space has its own title. St Kilda is a very trendy and popular area and it is anticipated that this property will rent for $470pw. The client used a buyer’s agent to source this investment property as she was buying into an area she was unfamiliar with.


Settlement Date – 23/10/2009
Client – Local – 1120
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $195,000
Transaction type – Off the plan town house
Suburb – Queanbeyan, ACT
Property Type – One bedroom unit on first floor with LU garage.
Attributes – Living area is 35m2. The property was bought from a developer around12 months ago, but has only just settled due to garage and boundary issues with Council. Rented at $245pw.


Settlement Date – 23/10/2009
Client –interstate, Victoria – 1678
Purchase type – Block and build
Purchase price – $295,000
Transaction type – construction
Suburb – Point Cook, VIC
Property Type – 3 bed with single garage, entry level property
Attributes – Located close to a new shopping centre and public transport and only 20 minutes from Melbourne CBD.


Settlement Date – 13/10/2009
Client –Local – 2004
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $445,000
Transaction type – On market, Private treaty
Suburb – Flynn – Canberra, ACT
Property Type – 4 bedroom with ensuite, double lock up garage and in-ground pool
Attributes – Close to Belconnen Mall (Westfield), this property will rent for $440pw


Settlement Date – 26/10/2009
Client –interstate – Sydney – 1653
Purchase type – 2 bed unit
Purchase price – $255,000
Transaction type – on market found through realestate.com
Suburb – Wiley Park (Punchbowl area), Sydney
Property Type – 2 bed unit wit off street parking
Attributes – Renting for $340pw, the property had been re carpeted and painted by the vendor.


Settlement Date – 13/10/2009
Client –interstate– Victoria – 1618
Purchase type – Investment
Purchase price – $350,000
Transaction type – Auction
Suburb – Soldiers Hill (near Ballarat), VIC
Property Type – Two x 2 bedroom units and one x 1 bedroom unit
Attributes – 3 units on a single title which means multiple tenants and multiple income. All three are currently renting for $355pw, but with a cosmetic make over this is expected to increase to around $520 pw.


Settlement Date – 27/10/2009
Client –Brisbane – 1562
Purchase type – Block and build
Purchase price – $484,000
Transaction type – construction
Suburb – Warner, QLD
Property Type – 4 bed ensuite with double garage and attached 2 bed flat with single garage
Attributes – Comparative sales in the area suggest that this property will be worth approximately $550k on completion, with the flat renting for $300pw and the house for $370 pw.


Settlement Date – 26/10/2009
Client –Local – 1627
Purchase type – Investment
Construction price – $157,265
Transaction type – Construction of dual occupancy on back of existing investment property
Suburb – Hamlyn Heights (Geelong area), VIC
Property Type – construction of a new 3 bedroom home with ensuite + double lock up garage – around 123m2
Attributes – This client specialises in buying large blocks in this area, building on the back and then splitting the titles. They bought the original house in June 2008 for $245k and the end valuation for both properties upon completion will be around $490,000, which spells an $88k gain over both. They will be held and tenanted for $250pw for the old front house and $350pw for the new back one. The client’s wife does it all by satellite!

Case study – How Nick and Jill used a developer strategy to accelerate wealth creation

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Over the last few years Developer’s Edge have managed to help many clients achieve extraordinary results in property by using developer strategies with their next property investment. The team at Developers Edge provide a one stop shop approach in helping investors create wealth in property. The key services that the company provides are:

  • Identifying suitable properties
  • Conducting a feasibility analysis
  • Assisting with negotiation
  • Conducting a due diligence investigation in order to determine the suitability of the site
  • Assist with town planning applications
  • Construct dwelling
  • Provide regular feedback
  • Co ordinate sales or rental

Nick approached us initially in 2005 after a recommendation from Ed Nixon. Nick lived in Canberra, where he worked as a contractor assigned to work for the Defence department. We had several conversations over the telephone on the type of development opportunities available and the funds required for each. In the end, it was decided that we were to look for an old house in an established area that could be subdivided to create two new detached dwellings.

We spent a few weeks looking for an available site and eventually found an old run down house that had been on the market for several months. It was initially listed for $340k however, the vendors were motivated sellers and through some good negotiations we managed to help Nick secure the block for $290k.

We chose to focus our research in the Redcliffe area, as we identified this as an undervalued suburb that had good scope for future growth. Redcliffe is located approximately 30km north of Brisbane and is a highly desirable locality due to its proximity to the water. The other main feature of the area is its position; being on a peninsula and surrounded by water means land supply is limited. Most of the land there has been developed and the way forward seemed to be through redevelopment.

Demolition began soon after settlement.

house2

house 3

The site was acquired in November 2005 and the project was finished in August 2006. The total time for the project was ten months. The feasibility report below shows a summary of all the costs associated with the project and the overall profit in the project. The end values were determined by a bank valuation on project completion which was conducted by Nick’s bank.

feasability study

At the end of the project we were able to organise tenants for Nick and each property was rented out for $360.00 and $340.00 per week.

As we were nearing completion Nick decided that he would like to repeat the process again. Therefore, soon after we were able to find a site in Scarborough, another suburb in Redcliffe. This time the 809sqm site was acquired for $329,250, however it was on a single lot. This means we had to apply for a Development approval and pay extra council contribution charges. The project also took a lot longer to finish. Regardless of the extra costs associated with this project, Nick still made a profit of $110 000.00 on completion.

Currently, Nick and his partner Jill are having time off investing while they focus on a new arrival in the family. They have accumulated a lot of equity as a result of using a developer strategy with their property investing and once Jill is back at work, they will be ready to continue with their winning ways.

Mortgage Managers explained

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Mortgage ManagerMortgage managers are finance specialists who organise funding for property investors and home buyers from numerous sources. Their role is to not only arrange the necessary funds for your property loan, but also manage and administer your loan for its duration, from credit assessment right through to monitoring your repayments, applicable insurance and renewals, interest rate adjustments and any variations for the life of the loan.

Many prospective borrowers are not fully aware of how mortgage managers operate (or even their existence for that matter!), and as such are concerned as to their safety and reliability. The fact is mortgage managers do not represent any type of issue for borrowers and can be of great benefit, as they do not lend their own money for home or investment loans, but instead source their funds from a variety of independent lenders. In other words, they do not act as banks or take deposits.

Mortgage Managers use many different sources to arrange funding for home and investment loans, including unit trusts, superannuation funds, securitised funds and even the banking sector. In fact a common source of funds for mortgage managers are some of the smaller banks that do not have extensive and costly branch networks, which allows mortgage managers to pass on their more competitive rates to clients.

The mortgage manager is not responsible for any funding at the end of the day, as the original provider of the funds (who works through a trustee) owns the mortgage in entirety. The trustee’s role is to ensure that the mortgage manager is professionally and appropriately managing your mortgage on a daily basis.

For instance, if your mortgage manager ceased operations at any time over the duration of your mortgage, the trustee would appoint another mortgage manager to continue administration of your mortgage under new management.

Mortgage Managers are a great asset to borrowers, for two reasons.

Firstly, because they have their own DLA’s (Delegated Lending Authority), if they like the application they can approve it on the spot without referring to the funder. This usually results in faster approvals and gives them the ability to pick and choose the type of business they’d like to have on their books.

And secondly, they are competitively priced. An example of this is a mortgage manager called Choice Lend (Funded by NAB), who are currently offering investment loans for 5.80%, which is not bad when you consider that Westpac are charging 6.06% for their comparative product.

Mortgage Managers are certainly worth considerating now that NAB is one of the major underwriters in the market.

What to do next

Call us for a chat
1300 657 132

Middle of the night? Leave a message and we'll call you back

Subscribe to the
Trilogy Report

Our monthly e-newsletter on property finance for investors